Support Sudbury

subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link
subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link
subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link
subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link
subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link
subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link
subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link
subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link

Teacher Salaries/Contracts

Why do SPS teachers have seven personal days available to them? Isn’t this excessive?

Excerpt from Sudbury Public Schools' FAQs:

Like all such benefits, this one is no doubt a function of long-ago negotiations and likely was offered as an inducement to offset, in part, Sudbury’s relatively low pay in relation to our peer communitiesThis benefit, of course, only becomes a problem if it is abused.  While, of course, in any large group of employees there will be those who use them if they have them, in general, we have not seen widespread abuse of this benefit. 

Why are teachers who live outside of Sudbury allowed to enroll their children in Sudbury Schools?

Excerpt from Sudbury Public Schools' FAQs:

This is a benefit that is widely available in school districts across Massachusetts.  It has been afforded to teachers in Sudbury in part to compensate for a lower salary schedule, in part to recognize the fact that many of our employees cannot live in our community, and in part as a statement of pride that the employees providing the education in a district want their children in the district.  It allows Sudbury to remain competitive with peer communities in attracting and retaining good teachers at little additional direct cost.  This is the case because as these students are distributed across the system, they can be educated with little in the way of additional direct costs.  While they may increase class size where they are placed at any given time, because they are not all in one class or at one grade level, they do not require the addition of another teacher.  Students are placed in classes only on a space-available basis.  At no time will sections/classes be added solely to accommodate children of staff.  It is also important to note that once enrolled, these students are considered resident students under the Massachusetts school finance regulations and they generate state aid just as if a resident of Sudbury.

Do teachers contribute to their health insurance plans?

Excerpt from Sudbury Public Schools' FAQs:

Yes.  Approximately 90% of Sudbury’s K-8 teachers, as do other town employees, pay 10% of their health insurance premiums. The remaining 10% of the staff pay a higher proportion.  L/S teachers pay 25% of their health insurance premiums.

Is Sudbury competitive compared to other districts when you evaluate teacher compensation, including benefits?

Excerpt from Sudbury Public Schools' FAQs:

Total teacher compensation is made up, in large part, of salary and benefits. A side-by-side comparison of salaries alone reveals that SPS salaries are among the lowest of our peer communities and lower than the state average. When you factor in the cost of benefits, the SPS compensation package is in line with our peer communities. This total compensation comparison is included in the District’s current Benchmarking data sheet that is available on the SPS District website. Additional data about every other District in Massachusetts can be found on the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education [DESE] website (formerly the Department of Education).

It seems like all the teachers who were cut last year ended up working in a different capacity in the system. Related question: why were some elementary schools looking for employees at the beginning of the school year when they had just laid off people because of budget cuts?

Excerpt from Sudbury Public Schools' FAQs:

The SPS cut more than 22 FTEs (Full Time Equivalents) last year.  Thirty staff members lost all or part of their jobs.  Even in years during which there are lay-offs, Districts such as the SPS face retirements, relocations within the District, resignations and leaves of absence.  These positions are filled, but the resultant hiring does not cause the budget to exceed what the voters have agreed to provide.  Some of these positions were filled by staff members had who lost other positions. Thus, while there may have been some reshuffling of human resources and hiring to address any openings that occurred, the cuts did in fact result in the elimination of more than 22 FTEs.